2016 season

4-team CFP era

Latest update: 2026-10-18 5:01 am ET  |  Week 15 status: COMPLETE

2016 Harbin Rankings

Power 4 conferences

Other FBS conferences

Independents

2016 season summary

Harbin's top four matches the real one on 3 of 4 spots: it adds Penn State and leaves out Washington.

Among games between teams the committee ranked, Harbin put the loser above the winner in 11 of 42 (the committee: 9), and picked 3 of 9 postseason games (the committee: 4), behind the committee overall.

It flags no team that looks out of place.

MeasureHarbinCFP committee (2016-12-04)
Results contradicted (fewer is better)11 of 42 (26%)9 of 42 (21%)
Postseason picks right3 of 9 (33%)4 of 9 (44%)
Playoff field matched3 of 4 (75%)n/a

Field changes

Teams Harbin would add to, or drop from, the real field.

Harbin adds

TeamHarbinCFP committeeWhy
Penn State#4#5
  • Penn State beat 3 Harbin top-25 teams (Ohio State #2, Wisconsin #12 and Iowa #22) and 2 more in the top 50 (Temple #35 and Minnesota #50); Washington, the team it displaces, has 2 top-25 wins and 2 more in the top 50.
  • Penn State beat 3 teams with 9+ wins (Ohio State 11-1, Temple 10-3 and Wisconsin 10-3), so its Level 2 term (25.1) ranks #4 in FBS; Washington's is 24.6 (#5).
  • Penn State (30.33) and Washington (30.26) are only 0.07 points apart: a narrow call.

Harbin drops

TeamHarbinCFP committeeWhy
Washington#5#4
  • Washington is 12-1: its best wins are Colorado #16 and Stanford #19, and it lost to USC #15.
  • Washington (30.26) and Penn State (30.33) are only 0.07 points apart: a narrow call.

Biggest disagreements

TeamHarbinCFP committeeW-LWhy
Auburn#32#148-4
  • Against Boise St (Harbin #14, the spot the committee gives Auburn), Auburn's beaten opponents earned 230.5 Level 1 points in all (291.5 for Boise St's), a Level 2 term of 16.0 to 20.0. Auburn beat 3 teams with losing records (UL Monroe 4-8, Mississippi St 5-7 and Ole Miss 5-7) and FCS Alabama A&M, which add little to Level 2; Boise St beat no team with 9+ wins. This accounts for 4.21 of the 4.58-point rating gap (92%).
  • Auburn lost 4 of its 12 games (Clemson 12-1, Texas A&M 8-4, Georgia 7-5 and Alabama 13-0), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average: 8 of its 12 games earn points, against 10 of 12 for Boise St (lost to Wyoming 8-5 and Air Force 9-3). This accounts for 0.92 of the 4.58-point rating gap (20%).
Utah#36#198-4
  • Against Stanford (Harbin #19, the spot the committee gives Utah), Utah's beaten opponents earned 223.0 Level 1 points in all (253.5 for Stanford's), a Level 2 term of 15.4 to 17.4. Utah beat 5 teams with losing records (Arizona 3-9, Oregon St 4-8, San José St 4-8, UCLA 4-8 and 1 more) and FCS Southern Utah, which add little to Level 2; Stanford beat 1 team with 9+ wins (USC 9-3). This accounts for 2.10 of the 2.94-point rating gap (71%).
  • Utah lost 4 of its 12 games (California 5-7, Washington 12-1, Oregon 4-8 and Colorado 10-3), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average: 8 of its 12 games earn points, against 9 of 12 for Stanford (lost to Washington 12-1, Washington St 8-4 and Colorado 10-3). This accounts for 0.50 of the 2.94-point rating gap (17%).
  • Utah's wins earn less: 5.69 Level 1 points per win, against 6.33 for Stanford. 3 of its 8 wins came over teams worth less than a top-tier win (6.5): 2 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: BYU and San José St) and FCS Southern Utah (3.0); Stanford had 1 (1 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: Rice)). This accounts for 0.46 of the 2.94-point rating gap (16%).
Boise St#14-10-2
  • Against Florida (Harbin #26, the first spot outside the committee's top 25), Boise St beat no team with 9+ wins, so its beaten opponents earned 291.5 Level 1 points in all (238.5 for Florida's), a Level 2 term of 20.0 to 18.2; Florida beat 3 teams with losing records (UMass 2-10, Missouri 4-8 and North Texas 5-7), which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 3.84 points, more than the whole 3.74-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Florida lost the SEC title game to Alabama (13-0): it was its 12th game and earned 0 points, so its Level 1 average fell from 4.45 to 4.08 and Alabama's 13 games went into its divisor with nothing earned; without that game Florida would rate 22.66 instead of 20.65. This accounts for 2.01 of the 3.74-point rating gap (54%).
  • Boise St lost 2 of its 12 games (Wyoming 8-5 and Air Force 9-3), against 3 of 11 for Florida (lost to Tennessee 8-4, Arkansas 7-5 and Florida St 9-3), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average. This accounts for 0.61 of the 3.74-point rating gap (16%).
Louisville#24#139-3
  • Against Tennessee (Harbin #13, the spot the committee gives Louisville), Louisville's beaten opponents earned 237.0 Level 1 points in all (304.0 for Tennessee's), a Level 2 term of 16.3 to 20.8. Louisville beat 5 teams with losing records (Virginia 2-10, Marshall 3-9, Charlotte 4-8, Duke 4-8 and 1 more), which add little to Level 2; Tennessee beat 2 teams with 9+ wins (App State 9-3 and Virginia Tech 9-4). This accounts for 4.60 points, more than the whole 3.64-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
Temple#35#2410-3
  • Against Louisville (Harbin #24, the spot the committee gives Temple), The teams Temple played had 157 games on their schedules in all, against 145 for Louisville's, and Level 2 is divided by that total, so each team Temple beat adds less. This accounts for 1.27 of the 1.70-point rating gap (74%).
  • Temple's wins earn less: 4.80 Level 1 points per win, against 6.17 for Louisville. 10 of its 10 wins came over teams worth less than a top-tier win (6.5): 9 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: Charlotte, SMU, UCF, South Florida and 5 more) and FCS Stony Brook (3.0); Louisville had 2 (2 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: Charlotte and Marshall)). This accounts for 1.04 of the 1.70-point rating gap (61%).
North Carolina#17-8-4
  • Against Florida (Harbin #26, the first spot outside the committee's top 25), North Carolina beat 1 team with 9+ wins (Florida St 9-3), so its beaten opponents earned 279.0 Level 1 points in all (238.5 for Florida's), a Level 2 term of 19.5 to 18.2; Florida beat 3 teams with losing records (UMass 2-10, Missouri 4-8 and North Texas 5-7), which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 2.96 points, more than the whole 2.61-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Florida lost the SEC title game to Alabama (13-0): it was its 12th game and earned 0 points, so its Level 1 average fell from 4.45 to 4.08 and Alabama's 13 games went into its divisor with nothing earned; without that game Florida would rate 22.66 instead of 20.65. This accounts for 2.01 of the 2.61-point rating gap (77%).
  • North Carolina beat 2 Harbin top-25 teams (Florida St #9 and Pitt #18) and 2 more in the top 50 (Georgia Tech #30 and Miami #31).
Florida#26#178-4
  • Against North Carolina (Harbin #17, the spot the committee gives Florida), Florida's beaten opponents earned 238.5 Level 1 points in all (279.0 for North Carolina's), a Level 2 term of 18.2 to 19.5. Florida beat 3 teams with losing records (UMass 2-10, Missouri 4-8 and North Texas 5-7), which add little to Level 2; North Carolina beat 1 team with 9+ wins (Florida St 9-3). This accounts for 2.96 points, more than the whole 2.61-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Florida lost the SEC title game to Alabama (13-0): it was its 12th game and earned 0 points, so its Level 1 average fell from 4.45 to 4.08 and Alabama's 13 games went into its divisor with nothing earned; without that game Florida would rate 22.66 instead of 20.65. This accounts for 2.01 of the 2.61-point rating gap (77%).
LSU#29#207-4
  • Against Houston (Harbin #20, the spot the committee gives LSU), LSU's beaten opponents earned 217.0 Level 1 points in all (259.0 for Houston's), a Level 2 term of 16.3 to 18.0. LSU beat 3 teams with losing records (Missouri 4-8, Mississippi St 5-7 and Ole Miss 5-7) and FCS Jax State, which add little to Level 2; Houston beat 3 teams with 9+ wins (Oklahoma 10-2, Louisville 9-3 and Tulsa 9-3). This accounts for 3.04 points, more than the whole 1.82-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • LSU lost 4 of its 11 games (Wisconsin 10-3, Auburn 8-4, Alabama 13-0 and Florida 8-4), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average: 7 of its 11 games earn points, against 9 of 12 for Houston (lost to Navy 9-3, SMU 5-7 and Memphis 8-4). This accounts for 0.62 of the 1.82-point rating gap (34%).
Tennessee#13#218-4
  • Against Nebraska (Harbin #21, the spot the committee gives Tennessee), Tennessee beat 2 teams with 9+ wins (App State 9-3 and Virginia Tech 9-4), so its beaten opponents earned 304.0 Level 1 points in all (248.5 for Nebraska's), a Level 2 term of 20.8 to 17.0; Nebraska beat 4 teams with losing records (Fresno St 1-11, Illinois 3-9, Purdue 3-9 and Oregon 4-8), which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 3.80 points, more than the whole 2.97-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Tennessee beat no Harbin top-25 team but 4 more in the top 50 (Florida #26, Virginia Tech #27, Georgia #34 and App State #39).
Navy#33#259-3
  • Against South Florida (Harbin #25, the spot the committee gives Navy), Navy lost the AAC title game to Temple (10-3): it was its 12th game and earned 0 points, so its Level 1 average fell from 4.05 to 3.71 and Temple's 13 games went into its divisor with nothing earned; without that game Navy would rate 21.11 instead of 19.35. This accounts for 1.76 points, more than the whole 1.43-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
W Michigan#8#1513-0
  • Against USC (Harbin #15, the spot the committee gives W Michigan), W Michigan beat 1 team with 9+ wins (Toledo 9-3), so its beaten opponents earned 337.5 Level 1 points in all (287.5 for USC's), a Level 2 term of 21.6 to 19.6; USC beat 7 teams with losing records (Arizona 3-9, Utah State 3-9, Notre Dame 4-8, Oregon 4-8 and 3 more), which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 3.30 points, more than the whole 2.40-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • W Michigan won all 13 of its games, against 3 of 12 for USC (lost to Alabama 13-0, Stanford 9-3 and Utah 8-4), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average. This accounts for 1.43 of the 2.40-point rating gap (59%).
  • W Michigan's Level 2 term (21.6) ranks #9 in FBS: Harbin rewards beating teams that won a lot.
USC#15#99-3
  • Against Florida St (Harbin #9, the spot the committee gives USC), USC's beaten opponents earned 287.5 Level 1 points in all (309.5 for Florida St's), a Level 2 term of 19.6 to 21.6. USC beat 7 teams with losing records (Arizona 3-9, Utah State 3-9, Notre Dame 4-8, Oregon 4-8 and 3 more), which add little to Level 2; Florida St beat 1 team with 9+ wins (South Florida 10-2). This accounts for 1.52 of the 1.79-point rating gap (85%).
  • The teams USC played had 147 games on their schedules in all, against 143 for Florida St's, and Level 2 is divided by that total, so each team USC beat adds less. This accounts for 0.57 of the 1.79-point rating gap (32%).
Colorado#16#1010-3
  • Against Oklahoma St (Harbin #10, the spot the committee gives Colorado), Colorado lost the Pac-12 title game to Washington (12-1): it was its 13th game and earned 0 points, so its Level 1 average fell from 5.00 to 4.62 and Washington's 13 games went into its divisor with nothing earned; without that game Colorado would rate 26.01 instead of 23.88. This accounts for 2.14 points, more than the whole 1.33-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
Houston#20-9-3
  • Florida (Harbin #26, the first spot outside the committee's top 25) lost the SEC title game to Alabama (13-0): it was its 12th game and earned 0 points, so its Level 1 average fell from 4.45 to 4.08 and Alabama's 13 games went into its divisor with nothing earned; without that game Florida would rate 22.66 instead of 20.65. This accounts for 2.01 points, more than the whole 1.17-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Houston beat 3 teams with 9+ wins (Oklahoma 10-2, Louisville 9-3 and Tulsa 9-3), so its beaten opponents earned 259.0 Level 1 points in all (238.5 for Florida's), a Level 2 term of 18.0 to 18.2; Florida beat 3 teams with losing records (UMass 2-10, Missouri 4-8 and North Texas 5-7), which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 1.49 points, more than the whole 1.17-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Houston's loss to 5-7 SMU counts no more in Harbin than a loss to a top-10 team; it is unranked in the committee ranking.

Checks

Harbin ranks these teams in its top 15, yet the reference left them unranked, and they are not on the ineligible list. Each may be missing a postseason ban.

TeamHarbinW-LNote
Boise St#1410-2Harbin #14 but unranked by the committee: check for a postseason ban or other ineligibility

Compared with CFP committee of 2016-12-04. Written 2026-10-17 from games through 2016-12-04.