2017 season

4-team CFP era

Latest update: 2026-10-18 5:01 am ET  |  Week 15 status: COMPLETE

2017 Harbin Rankings

Power 4 conferences

Other FBS conferences

Independents

2017 season summary

Harbin's top four matches the real one on 3 of 4 spots: it adds Ohio State and leaves out Alabama.

Among games between teams the committee ranked, Harbin put the loser above the winner in 10 of 41 (the committee: 10), and picked 6 of 11 postseason games (the committee: 6), level with the committee overall.

It flags 4 teams that look out of place: FAU (odd-in), San Diego St (odd-in), Troy (odd-in) and Toledo (odd-in).

MeasureHarbinCFP committee (2017-12-03)
Results contradicted (fewer is better)10 of 41 (24%)10 of 41 (24%)
Postseason picks right6 of 11 (55%)6 of 11 (55%)
Playoff field matched3 of 4 (75%)n/a

Field changes

Teams Harbin would add to, or drop from, the real field.

Harbin adds

TeamHarbinCFP committeeWhy
Ohio State#4#5
  • Against Alabama (the team it displaces), Ohio State beat 3 teams with 9+ wins (Wisconsin 12-1, Penn State 10-2 and Michigan St 9-3), so its beaten opponents earned 411.5 Level 1 points in all (360.5 for Alabama's), a Level 2 term of 26.0 to 24.9; Alabama beat 3 teams with losing records (Arkansas 4-8, Tennessee 4-8 and Vanderbilt 5-7) and FCS Mercer, which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 3.37 points, more than the whole 1.03-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Ohio State's wins earn more: 6.23 Level 1 points per win, against 5.91 for Alabama. 9 of its 11 wins came over top-tier teams (6.5 each: Wisconsin #6, Penn State #10, Michigan St #15, Michigan #37 and 5 more); Alabama had 8 of 11, plus 2 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: Fresno St and Colorado St) and FCS Mercer (3.0). This accounts for 0.28 of the 1.03-point rating gap (27%).
  • Ohio State beat 3 Harbin top-25 teams (Wisconsin #6, Penn State #10 and Michigan St #15) and 1 more in the top 50 (Michigan #37); Alabama, the team it displaces, has 1 top-25 win and 3 more in the top 50.

Harbin drops

TeamHarbinCFP committeeWhy
Alabama#7#4
  • Against Ohio State (the team that takes its place), Alabama's beaten opponents earned 360.5 Level 1 points in all (411.5 for Ohio State's), a Level 2 term of 24.9 to 26.0. Alabama beat 3 teams with losing records (Arkansas 4-8, Tennessee 4-8 and Vanderbilt 5-7) and FCS Mercer, which add little to Level 2; Ohio State beat 3 teams with 9+ wins (Wisconsin 12-1, Penn State 10-2 and Michigan St 9-3). This accounts for 3.37 points, more than the whole 1.03-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Alabama's wins earn less: 5.91 Level 1 points per win, against 6.23 for Ohio State. 3 of its 11 wins came over teams worth less than a top-tier win (6.5): 2 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: Fresno St and Colorado St) and FCS Mercer (3.0); Ohio State had 2 (2 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: Army and UNLV)). This accounts for 0.28 of the 1.03-point rating gap (27%).

Outliers

TeamKindHarbinCFP committeeAPFPIW-LWhy
FAUHarbin has in, reference does not#18--#6110-3
  • Against NC State (Harbin #26, the first spot outside the committee's top 25), FAU beat 1 team with 9+ wins (North Texas 9-4), so its beaten opponents earned 295.5 Level 1 points in all (241.0 for NC State's), a Level 2 term of 18.7 to 16.7; NC State beat 3 teams with losing records (North Carolina 3-9, Syracuse 4-8 and Pitt 5-7) and FCS Furman, which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 3.62 points, more than the whole 1.74-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • FAU lost 3 of its 13 games (Navy 6-5, Wisconsin 12-1 and Buffalo 6-6), against 4 of 12 for NC State (lost to South Carolina 8-4, Notre Dame 9-3, Clemson 12-1 and Wake Forest 7-5), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average. This accounts for 0.55 of the 1.74-point rating gap (31%).
San Diego StHarbin has in, reference does not#22--#5210-2
  • Against NC State (Harbin #26, the first spot outside the committee's top 25), San Diego St lost 2 of its 12 games (Boise St 10-3 and Fresno St 9-4), against 4 of 12 for NC State (lost to South Carolina 8-4, Notre Dame 9-3, Clemson 12-1 and Wake Forest 7-5), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average. This accounts for 0.91 points, more than the whole 0.77-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • San Diego St beat 1 team with 9+ wins (Stanford 9-4), so its beaten opponents earned 252.5 Level 1 points in all (241.0 for NC State's), a Level 2 term of 17.2 to 16.7; NC State beat 3 teams with losing records (North Carolina 3-9, Syracuse 4-8 and Pitt 5-7) and FCS Furman, which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 0.79 points, more than the whole 0.77-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
TroyHarbin has in, reference does not#24--#7110-2
  • Against NC State (Harbin #26, the first spot outside the committee's top 25), Troy lost 2 of its 12 games (Boise St 10-3 and South Alabama 4-8), against 4 of 12 for NC State (lost to South Carolina 8-4, Notre Dame 9-3, Clemson 12-1 and Wake Forest 7-5), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average. This accounts for 0.90 points, more than the whole 0.54-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Troy beat 1 team with 9+ wins (LSU 9-3), so its beaten opponents earned 244.0 Level 1 points in all (241.0 for NC State's), a Level 2 term of 17.1 to 16.7; NC State beat 3 teams with losing records (North Carolina 3-9, Syracuse 4-8 and Pitt 5-7) and FCS Furman, which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 0.21 of the 0.54-point rating gap (39%).
  • The teams NC State played had 144 games on their schedules in all, against 143 for Troy's, and Level 2 is divided by that total, so each team NC State beat adds less. This accounts for 0.12 of the 0.54-point rating gap (22%).
ToledoHarbin has in, reference does not#25--#4811-2
  • Against NC State (Harbin #26, the first spot outside the committee's top 25), Toledo beat no team with 9+ wins, so its beaten opponents earned 266.5 Level 1 points in all (241.0 for NC State's), a Level 2 term of 17.0 to 16.7; NC State beat 3 teams with losing records (North Carolina 3-9, Syracuse 4-8 and Pitt 5-7) and FCS Furman, which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 1.70 points, more than the whole 0.40-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Toledo lost 2 of its 13 games (Miami 10-2 and Ohio 8-4), against 4 of 12 for NC State (lost to South Carolina 8-4, Notre Dame 9-3, Clemson 12-1 and Wake Forest 7-5), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average. This accounts for 0.96 points, more than the whole 0.40-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.

Biggest disagreements

TeamHarbinCFP committeeW-LWhy
Oklahoma St#32#199-3
  • Against TCU (Harbin #19, the spot the committee gives Oklahoma St), Oklahoma St's beaten opponents earned 217.5 Level 1 points in all (279.0 for TCU's), a Level 2 term of 14.9 to 19.4. Oklahoma St beat 5 teams with losing records (Baylor 1-11, Kansas 1-11, Tulsa 2-10, South Alabama 4-8 and 1 more), which add little to Level 2; TCU beat 1 team with 9+ wins (Oklahoma St 9-3). This accounts for 4.24 points, more than the whole 2.86-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Oklahoma St lost 3 of its 12 games (TCU 10-3, Oklahoma 12-1 and Kansas St 7-5), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average: 9 of its 12 games earn points, against 10 of 12 for TCU (lost to Iowa State 7-5 and Oklahoma 12-1). This accounts for 0.51 of the 2.86-point rating gap (18%).
  • Oklahoma St has no win over a Harbin top-25 team (best win: Iowa State #34).
Boise St#17#2510-3
  • Against Toledo (Harbin #25, the spot the committee gives Boise St), Boise St beat 3 teams with 9+ wins (San Diego St 10-2, Troy 10-2 and Fresno St 9-4), so its beaten opponents earned 308.0 Level 1 points in all (266.5 for Toledo's), a Level 2 term of 19.4 to 17.0; Toledo beat 5 teams with losing records (Ball State 2-10, Bowling Green 2-10, Tulsa 2-10, Nevada 3-9 and 1 more) and FCS Elon, which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 2.63 points, more than the whole 2.17-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Boise St beat 2 Harbin top-25 teams (San Diego St #22 and Troy #24) and 1 more in the top 50 (Fresno St #43).
FAU#18-10-3
  • Against NC State (Harbin #26, the first spot outside the committee's top 25), FAU beat 1 team with 9+ wins (North Texas 9-4), so its beaten opponents earned 295.5 Level 1 points in all (241.0 for NC State's), a Level 2 term of 18.7 to 16.7; NC State beat 3 teams with losing records (North Carolina 3-9, Syracuse 4-8 and Pitt 5-7) and FCS Furman, which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 3.62 points, more than the whole 1.74-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • FAU lost 3 of its 13 games (Navy 6-5, Wisconsin 12-1 and Buffalo 6-6), against 4 of 12 for NC State (lost to South Carolina 8-4, Notre Dame 9-3, Clemson 12-1 and Wake Forest 7-5), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average. This accounts for 0.55 of the 1.74-point rating gap (31%).
Memphis#28#2010-2
  • Against Virginia Tech (Harbin #20, the spot the committee gives Memphis), Memphis lost the AAC title game to UCF (12-0): it was its 12th game and earned 0 points, so its Level 1 average fell from 4.50 to 4.13 and UCF's 12 games went into its divisor with nothing earned; without that game Memphis would rate 22.19 instead of 20.32. This accounts for 1.87 points, more than the whole 1.53-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.
  • Memphis's beaten opponents earned 230.0 Level 1 points in all (250.5 for Virginia Tech's), a Level 2 term of 17.7 to 17.5. Memphis beat 5 teams with losing records (Tulsa 2-10, East Carolina 3-9, UConn 3-9, UL Monroe 4-8 and 1 more) and FCS S Illinois, which add little to Level 2; Virginia Tech beat no team with 9+ wins. This accounts for 1.51 of the 1.53-point rating gap (98%).
  • Memphis's wins earn less: 4.95 Level 1 points per win, against 5.78 for Virginia Tech. 9 of its 10 wins came over teams worth less than a top-tier win (6.5): 8 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: UL Monroe, UConn, Navy, Houston and 4 more) and FCS S Illinois (3.0); Virginia Tech had 3 (2 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: East Carolina and Old Dominion) and FCS Delaware (3.0)). This accounts for 0.69 of the 1.53-point rating gap (45%).
Mississippi St#31#238-4
  • Against LSU (Harbin #23, the spot the committee gives Mississippi St), Mississippi St's beaten opponents earned 231.5 Level 1 points in all (241.5 for LSU's), a Level 2 term of 15.9 to 16.8. Mississippi St beat 3 teams with losing records (Arkansas 4-8, BYU 4-9 and UMass 4-8) and FCS Charleston So, which add little to Level 2; LSU beat 1 team with 9+ wins (Auburn 10-3). This accounts for 0.69 of the 1.71-point rating gap (40%).
  • Mississippi St lost 4 of its 12 games (Georgia 12-1, Auburn 10-3, Alabama 11-1 and Ole Miss 6-6), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average: 8 of its 12 games earn points, against 9 of 12 for LSU (lost to Mississippi St 8-4, Troy 10-2 and Alabama 11-1). This accounts for 0.48 of the 1.71-point rating gap (28%).
  • Mississippi St's wins earn less: 5.50 Level 1 points per win, against 5.94 for LSU. 4 of its 8 wins came over teams worth less than a top-tier win (6.5): 3 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: Louisiana Tech, BYU and UMass) and FCS Charleston So (3.0); LSU had 2 (1 over other FBS teams (5.0 each: BYU) and FCS Chattanooga (3.0)). This accounts for 0.31 of the 1.71-point rating gap (18%).
UCF#5#1212-0
  • Auburn (Harbin #12, the spot the committee gives UCF) lost the SEC title game to Georgia (12-1): it was its 13th game and earned 0 points, so its Level 1 average fell from 4.88 to 4.50 and Georgia's 13 games went into its divisor with nothing earned; without that game Auburn would rate 29.50 instead of 27.09. This accounts for 2.40 of the 3.39-point rating gap (71%).
  • UCF won all 12 of its games, against 2 of 12 for Auburn (lost to Clemson 12-1 and LSU 9-3), and every loss is a game worth 0 points in the Level 1 average. This accounts for 0.90 of the 3.39-point rating gap (27%).
  • UCF beat 2 teams with 9+ wins (Memphis 10-2 and South Florida 9-2), so its beaten opponents earned 365.0 Level 1 points in all (357.0 for Auburn's), a Level 2 term of 25.5 to 24.6; Auburn beat 3 teams with losing records (GA Southern 2-10, Arkansas 4-8 and UL Monroe 4-8) and FCS Mercer, which add little to Level 2. This accounts for 0.56 of the 3.39-point rating gap (16%).
LSU#23#179-3
  • Against Boise St (Harbin #17, the spot the committee gives LSU), LSU's beaten opponents earned 241.5 Level 1 points in all (308.0 for Boise St's), a Level 2 term of 16.8 to 19.4. LSU beat 5 teams with losing records (Arkansas 4-8, BYU 4-9, Florida 4-7, Syracuse 4-8 and 1 more) and FCS Chattanooga, which add little to Level 2; Boise St beat 3 teams with 9+ wins (San Diego St 10-2, Troy 10-2 and Fresno St 9-4). This accounts for 4.40 points, more than the whole 1.99-point rating gap; other factors pull the other way.

Compared with CFP committee of 2017-12-03. Written 2026-10-17 from games through 2017-12-03.